Pageviews last month

Henry Nasilele

Henry Nasilele
This is Me !
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

A United Zambia is Must!

To our citizens who are young at heart and the old generation who may not remember, we need to know how the Republic of Zambia came into being to enable us to understand our present political divergence in the country.

Before 1911 the territory currently known as Zambia was divided into two separate entities known as North-Eastern Rhodesia and North - Western Rhodesia.

Both territories were under British colonial rule.

The capital of North Eastern Rhodesia was at Fort Jameson (currently known as Chipata).

The Fort was established to defend the British ruled territory from other colonialists and hostile natives.

You may be interested to know that the "Policemen's language", commonly known as "Nyanja" originates from Fort Jameson.

It was developed as a dialect from the local languages of African tribes found in North-Eastern Rhodesia.

The capital of North Western Rhodesia was initially at Kalomo.

It was the first administrative centre of Northern Rhodesia, serving until the capital city was established at Livingstone in 1907.

The British colonial masters then merged the two into one territory know as Northern Rhodesia after 1911.

The capital of Northern Rhodesia was eventually moved to Lusaka.

You may be interested to know that the name "Lusaka" originates from a Chief who was found around there called Lusakasa , which the British abbreviated to Lusaka.

There is a school in Lusaka called Lusakasa which is named in honour of the Chief.

Northern Rhodesia and the neighbouring British ruled territories of Nyasaland (now Malawi) and Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) were then merged into a Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland.

The administrative capital for this Federation was set at Fort Salisbury, later to be called Salisbury until independence in 1980 when Southern Rhodesia became the Republic of Zimbabwe when it was renamed Harare.

After the establishment of the Federation, there was resentment amongst the black nationals who were not happy with the way the wealth from the three territories were managed.

It was felt that most of the wealth from these territories was used to develop Southern Rhodesia more than the other two territories.

Salisbury became more developed than Lusaka and Blantyre (now Zomba) which was the capital of Malawi at independence. Even today this historic fact is still evident.

The capital of Malawi was later shifted to Lilongwe.

This brought about the call for the disbandment of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland by black nationalists (later to become the politicians) of these territories.

The Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland came to an end in 1953.

Thereafter, the African nationalists in the three territories demanded independence  of these territories from British colonial rule.

This saw the independence of Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland from British rule in 1964 to become the Republics of Zambia and Malawi respectively.

The white administrators in Southern Rhodesia did not want the country to be ruled by the native blacks, so on 11th November 1965 they declared UDI (Unilateral Declaration of Independence) from British rule.

The UDI saw the begin  of a bitter 15-year guerilla bush war when the blacks in Southern Rhodesia , which was called Rhodesia after UDI, resorted to fighting the white rebels (under Ian Smith) from the bush.

This war affected the Republic of Zambia because the Freedom Fighters took refuge in the country and the rebels in Rhodesia used to bomb certain parts of the country in pursuit of the Freedom Fighters.

When the Liberation Centre was bombed by the white rebels in the 70s I was in Lusaka as a student at UNZA.

As students at UNZA we were conscripted into the Zambia National Service to go for military training in 1973 in order to protect the country from rebel attacks.

The UDI brought a lot of economic hardships to the Republic of Zambia in many ways.

The county was subjected to border closures, military attacks and siege by the white rebels in Rhodesia, the white Apartheid racist regime in South Africa and the Portuguese ruled territories of Mozambique and Angola.

Under the leadership of Dr. Kenneth Kaunda, who became the President of Zambia in 1964 (he was called Prime Minister then) the country managed to pull through these hardships.

This part of our history needs a separate writing about it!  

As stated earlier, North-Eastern Rhodesia and North -Western became Northern Rhodesia in 1911.

Northern Rhodesia was part of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland until 1953 when the Federation was disbanded due to African nationalist pressure.

Northern Rhodesia became the Republic of Zambia on 24th October 1964.

Now coming back to our present voting pattern in our Elections, you may notice that these are based on the historic basis of the two former British ruled territories of North-Eastern Rhodesia and North- Western Rhodesia.

A lot of people talk without knowing where we are coming from a Nation.

Ignorance is our greatest enemy today and if not checked it could lead to animosity in the country.

The Bible teaches us that: -

“My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge. "Because you have rejected knowledge, I also reject you as my priests; because you have ignored the law of your God, I also will ignore your children.”

The challenge of our current political leaders is to keep the unity of this country so that it is not again divided as the British colonialists did before 1911 and it must remain a ONE ZAMBIA and a ONE NATION!

AMEN !!


REFERENCES :

For those who may be interested to read in detail about the history of our beloved country, you may get details from the links given below, from Libraries or research online, etc.

1) North - Eastern Rhodesia



2) North- Western Rhodesia

3)  Historical Atlas – The History of Zambia



Tuesday, March 30, 2010

The Need to Change Some Laws

There was a news item on one of the local Radio Stations on the Copperbelt recently. It was about a minor who was nearly defiled by a youth in one of the townships.

Twelve year old , Angela (not her real name) was sent by her mother to go and purchase some groceries from the market.

The market is a distance away from the girl's home. She had to walk on a footpath, that passes through a small patch of bush and grass for about three hundred metres, before she could reach the market.

As she was walking on the footpath, she sensed that someone was following her.

When she looked back she saw a young man of about twenty five hurrying to catch up with her.

Sensing danger, she started running away from him. He soon caught up with her and forcefully dragged her into a nearby bush.

At this moment, the girl started shouting for help at the top of her voice.

The brute forced her to the ground and was soon on top of her. He started to undo his zipper whilst attempting to stop her from shouting by gagging her with a piece of cloth.

He was about to defile her when three men and a woman, who had heard the shouts of the girl, arrived on the scene.

They pounced on the young man and dragged him away from the minor before he could do any harm to her.

He was slapped hard on the face by the three men.

As a result of the noise from the commotion, a crowd soon grew around the scene.

Some people were about to lynch the young man for his evil intentions.

After some heated debate amongst the people in the crowd, a decision was made to take him and the girl to the nearest police station.

The mother to the girl was informed about the incident. She rushed to the police station in great shock.

The young man was locked up in the police cells and the girl's mother was told to take her to hospital for a medical report.

The medical report indicated that the girl was not sexually violated in any way.

The young man was released from police custody the following day, after paying an admission of guilty charge.

The people of the township were incensed with the police decision of merely charging the young man with "conduct likely to cause breach of public peace".

The following day, a group of angry people from the neighbourhood, where the girl stays, converged on the police station to protest.

They demanded to know why the young man was freed.

They had expected him to be locked up in remand prison awaiting court trial for an offence of attempted defilement of a minor.

The police allegedly told them that there is no such criminal offence as "attempted defilement" !

The crowd was not happy with this explanation. They soon became unruly and were about to riot.

They were warned that their action could result in them being locked up for "conduct likely to cause the breach of public peace."

When one ponders over this case, it looks very unfair to the poor girl and her mother.

Did it require the offending man to actually sexually penetrate the girl for him to be charged with the intended criminal offence ?

Why is it that attempted murder is a criminal offence whilst attempted rape and attempted defilement are not ?

Were the police in order to charge the man with an offence of conduct likely to cause breach of public peace ?

If the family of the minor decided to sue the man, what is the appropriate law that would apply?

It is high time our law makers made a review of some of the laws that are not protecting the rights of vulnerable people like women and children.